3 ms·

you don’t understand babies are killed (rares Nowadays) and selective abortions (million a year ) if it is not boy. while the national average is 1100 , there

you don’t understand babies are killed (rares Nowadays) and selective abortions (million a year ) if it is not boy. while the national average is 1100 , there are already states where it is 1250 or more , they already import brides from other states because finding a match is harder . sex detection although illegal still happens , and abortions follow The numbers are real for both countries and are well verified over last few decades the problem is also well reported . Sadly it found to be actually correlated with higher income and material income , states with higher per capita income have more sex selective abortions

saithound 6y ago
> you don’t understand babies are killed (rares Nowadays) and selective abortions (million a year ) if it is not boy. I do understand. I know that the skew exists. I'm saying precisely that the propoposed "not illegal, not unethical" explanations do not explain the skew; in fact, it's mathematically impossible for the style of family planning strategies (e.g. stop having children if the first one is a girl) to cause this kind of skew.
- manquer 6y ago
  Illegal certainly, but hard to enforce as knowing the sex is not difficult at all(although illegal), ultrasounds are cheap devices do not even need a lot of expertise to handle . How will you even control abortions ? It is not like the U.S. where abortions are a political issue and ppl make it intentionally difficult , everyone is in favour of terminating unwanted pregnancies, it is just that is unwanted because of the sex many times and that’s hard to enforce as a law.
kamaal 6y ago
>>Sadly it found to be actually correlated with higher income and material income , states with higher per capita income have more sex selective abortions The more your income is perceived to be, the more dowry you have to pay. Plus you feel the need for a male heir to inherit all that money. That explains it.

saithound 6y ago

> you don’t understand babies are killed (rares Nowadays) and selective abortions (million a year ) if it is not boy. I do understand. I know that the skew exists. I'm saying precisely that the propoposed "not illegal, not unethical" explanations do not explain the skew; in fact, it's mathematically impossible for the style of family planning strategies (e.g. stop having children if the first one is a girl) to cause this kind of skew.

manquer 6y ago
Illegal certainly, but hard to enforce as knowing the sex is not difficult at all(although illegal), ultrasounds are cheap devices do not even need a lot of expertise to handle . How will you even control abortions ? It is not like the U.S. where abortions are a political issue and ppl make it intentionally difficult , everyone is in favour of terminating unwanted pregnancies, it is just that is unwanted because of the sex many times and that’s hard to enforce as a law.

kamaal 6y ago

>>Sadly it found to be actually correlated with higher income and material income , states with higher per capita income have more sex selective abortions The more your income is perceived to be, the more dowry you have to pay. Plus you feel the need for a male heir to inherit all that money. That explains it.