2 ms·
Maybe a controversial opinion, but: the specific way in which Western capitalist societies (which were then pushed on to the rest of the developed world, direct
by ceilingcorner 6y ago
Maybe a controversial opinion, but: the specific way in which Western capitalist societies (which were then pushed on to the rest of the developed world, directly or indirectly) went about the liberation of women is a major cause of population implosion.
It used to be possible to raise a family on a single income. However, once corporate interests (and the blind market itself) realized that having women in the workforce would both increase potential consumers and increase the workforce (thus depressing wages), the model of everyone should be a worker first and a father/mother/family member second won out over alternatives. Add to that an entertainment-and-consumption-focused value system, and you have the present day: young people either can't afford to start families or are culturally discouraged to; to be a mid-twenties married couple with kids is almost embarrassing or shameful in many social groups.
We need a new model of work, in which parents (both men and women) aren't punished for simultaneously pursuing individual career goals and wanting to build a family unit.
- nocitrek 6y agoI agree with you. The message is mixed. You shouldn't have kids because climate change / woman should go into workforce, yet on the other hand we need people to support our eldery. So which is it? You can pile up immigrants to support eldery, but why don't we work on baby boom within our communities? Why don't western woman have 6-7 kids, like their African counterparts?