3 ms·
I'm honestly displeased with this ending. Universities that want to commit 100% learning online should not charge full price. Universities that are 100% online
by qserasera 6y ago
I'm honestly displeased with this ending. Universities that want to commit 100% learning online should not charge full price.
Universities that are 100% online before Covid should not be able to grant visas as they have no campus.
There is a LOT unregulated, unlegislated here and a lot that needs to be organized now. Many organizations will continue to set unacceptable standards for education and in my opinion need to be reigned in. MIT, Harvard's global relationship, albeit special by influence and money, should have to follow what the government sets. Government should have edified that universities without campuses cannot grant visas as well as a variety of other things.
In short this is a missed opportunity and a waste of time, much like many/all plans of this administration.
- laGrenouille 6y agoI do not disagree with your opinions about tuition or universities that were 100% online prior to the pandemic, but the original rule and subsequent retraction little to do with either point. None of these rules (directly) concern tuition money and it would be nearly impossible at the moment for a foreign student to work through the U.S. visa program to study at remote schools that do not have a history of issuing student visas. By the far the largest group of students effected by the policy are foreign nationals that did not return to their home countries in the spring and would be subject to immediate deportation in the fall depending on their school's form of instruction. This was a purely vindictive and xenophobic move by the administration. I was extremely happy to hear of this policy reversal. It (at least temporarily) removes some pointless stress on millions of students who already have more things to worry about than they should.