> Even when this problem is recognized, it turns out the most precise algorithm escaped us for decades--it's not as simple as adding them up low to high. It's o

> Even when this problem is recognized, it turns out the most precise algorithm escaped us for decades--it's not as simple as adding them up low to high. It's only been within the past 10 years that this optimal algorithm has been discovered. Interesting, do you have a link for us lazy but curious folk?