3 ms·
Some questions I had - which might spurn ideas. Obviously some may have undesirable side effects, some are technically challenging etc. Q: if emojis didnt coun
by caminmccluskey 6y ago
Some questions I had - which might spurn ideas. Obviously some may have undesirable side effects, some are technically challenging etc.
Q: if emojis didnt count towards character count, would the discourse on twitter be any better?
Q: What if tweets has a minimum character count, instead of a maximum?
Q: What if you could just detect Ad Hominem - https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/P19-2028.pdf https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/P19-2028.pdf
Q: What if Twitter had moderators?
Q: What if you had a reputation on Twitter - and your reputation determined your reach?
Q: What if you subscribed to topics and ideas - not to people?
Q: What if Twitter fact checked every post?
Q: What if there is no concept likes? OR what if there were downvotes as well as up?
Q: What if it were easier to mark something as harmful?
Q: What if the community was always kept small?
- valand 6y ago> OR what if there were downvotes as well as up? Downvotes can be abused for undermining people's thought you disagree on. Instead, provide a way to "counter-argument", which if upvoted, will count as downvote to the parent argument. This will enable people to "rob" votes of swing voters from the parent argument to the counter-argument Also, hint: you might want to separate those questions above d with double line endings
- caminmccluskey 6y agoReally like this idea, and thanks for the tip!