4 ms·
No, I do not consent to yet another source of EMF blasting me at all times. I also do not consent to my view of the cosmos being permanently altered. Hope thi
by pieceofcakedude 6y ago
No, I do not consent to yet another source of EMF blasting me at all times. I also do not consent to my view of the cosmos being permanently altered. Hope this idea, Starlink and all future competitors (it won't be just Starlink of course) go belly up.
- canada_dry 6y ago> Starlink and all future competitors go belly up That's probably unlikely for SpaceX given that they've slashed the normally sky-high barrier-to-entry for this endeavour. It's more likely that we'll see competing micro-satellite arrays from the likes of Russia and/or China within a decade.
- shaklee3 6y agoHuh? The barrier to entry isn't cheap rocket launches. It's a business plan with the satellite.
- RL_Quine 6y agoDo you not consent to space existing? You have far more exposure to all sorts of interesting radio frequencies from space every day than you'll ever see from a small radio.
- pieceofcakedude 6y agoIs this a troll post? I clearly said _another_ source of EMF. As in additional. Lets talk, do you find yourself getting accused of strawman attacks often?
- rvense 6y agoI find it absolutely infuriating that this cartoon villain can just decide to gunk up the sky for a commercial venture. This is like Nestle bottling public water.