4 ms·
> What we have is a Dictatorship of the Bourgeoisie that ignores the masses. Sounds like you've lost yourself in your wordplay. Where you draw the line between
by rumanator 6y ago
> What we have is a Dictatorship of the Bourgeoisie that ignores the masses.
Sounds like you've lost yourself in your wordplay. Where you draw the line between your "masses" and your "bourgeoise"?
- ipnon 6y agoAnd this tended to be the beginnings of violence in communist revolutions. It typically ends when the distinction between proletariat and bourgeoise dissolves into revolutionary and imperialist or party member and non-party member. Take China for example. The country became relatively peaceful internally once it became acceptable to merely not oppose the communist party, compared to the "revolutionary times" of the civil war and cultural revolution. I feel like good research on how and why revolutions arise, communist ones specifically, is lacking. We do not understand their initial conditions. Maybe we must turn to Marxists or communists directly for this understanding.