Curiously, what is your point here? I'm sure you understood the authors message, so i imagine your reply is cheeky in some manner. I imagine your reply pokes fu

Curiously, what is your point here? I'm sure you understood the authors message, so i imagine your reply is cheeky in some manner. I imagine your reply pokes fun at the idea of those being important. However.. i just don't get that. I imagine several billion people can disagree about many "important" things. Does that dismiss the importance of those items? How many millions of people live below basic human means? Should those basic means be considered unnecessary? I imagine if i lived in the woods in the middle of no where i might scoff at the idea of electricity. That doesn't invalidate peoples dependence on electricity. Which, is what is what i take from your comment. Sure, Youtube vs Electricity, not quite a fair comparison - i get that. Nevertheless your comment strikes off the mark for me, but perhaps i don't get your intent.