I think you'd agree that any claim it's 100% ineffective is a straw man, and was just for purposes of the example. FWICT, most policy is being set with a baked

I think you'd agree that any claim it's 100% ineffective is a straw man, and was just for purposes of the example. FWICT, most policy is being set with a baked-in assumption that remote learning is somewhat less effective than in-person learning. As I said, I don't see what the article does to add to that discussion, although it does possibly queue up a discussion on how we could make it better.