6 ms·
A well known religious University near me just started offering "in person" (wink wink) classes where attendance would not be taken. I was proud to see it.
by ngngngng 6y ago
A well known religious University near me just started offering "in person" (wink wink) classes where attendance would not be taken. I was proud to see it.
- thecleaner 6y agoI guess they understand that behind all the symbolism religion should be about welfare. Kudos.
- dmlittle 6y agoI figured some universities would start doing things like this. You can even make the class special in that it's pass/fail, doesn't affect your GPA, doesn't appear in your transcript, it's a special class that is free and doesn't increase your tuition, etc. Glad to know it's no longer going to be required to pull moves like this.
- bredren 6y agoThe criteria was actual not very challenging to meet. I think part of the reason they backed off was because the intent was not enforceable.
- msla 6y agoLoopholes work until a judge uses their ability to exercise judgment and judges that they don't work. Some people refuse to accept that laws are administered by humans.
- generationP 6y agoActually, most universities don't take attendance. It's a waste of time, it punishes pro-social behavior (there is no good reason for people feeling sick to go to class), and it's infantilizing. "Attendance required" often means "we will notice if you never attend, and then will feel less bad failing you if you don't do your homework either".
- wahern 6y agoMy law school classes took attendance. Rigorously. Because time management is a critical skill for attorneys, judges don't tolerate any amount of unannounced absenteeism, and missing filing deadlines can be and often is extremely costly, not just for you but for your client. (Also, taking attendance weeds out the liars. The ABA has strict attendance requirements and you're not supposed to get a degree if you miss them.) If was a very tough transition because, of course, both in undergraduate and in professional life lackadaisical attitudes were tolerated, especially so long as you otherwise performed the substantive work. We all love to rationalize away those things we dislike doing. But there was no wiggle room to rationalize it away in law school. I'm sure the military is similar.
- aspaceman 6y agoI think small classes and discussions (like in law school) are a different breed than large lectures. My view has always been that if the class is less than 10 or so students, attendance can be required. The students should be given the ability to email for an absence, no questions asked. In these cases, the success of the class is entirely dependent on students attending. If they don't, the class fails. Military you're trying to teach a hundred things besides just the material, so I think it's really fitting there.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- parsimo2010 6y ago> I'm sure the military is similar. Ironically, Roll Call is a formal concept in the military and rarely used after training. But the concept of accountability certainly exists. This varies by country, branch of service, and job, but it’s fairly common for young airmen (enlisted troops) in the USAF to be docked pay after showing up late to work a few times. The punishment usually goes something like a stern warning-> light paperwork-> paperwork in your permanent file and formal counseling. The next step is non-judicial punishment (named so because your only option is to accept the harsh punishment or be court martialed), which could mean any combination of confinement, demotion, forfeiture of pay, or several other things. The only things left after that are being discharged or sent to prison. And that’s for being late to work. If you backtalk the wrong person you could be demoted with no warning. And I know the Air Force Academy takes attendance every class because I had to. The registrar would occasionally audit the attendance system and notify the department chairs of instructors that didn’t log their attendance.