4 ms·

I'm alarmed by the way you've brought up Mikey Dickerson completely unprompted (both here and in the OP's comment section), and that your account is just two ho

I'm alarmed by the way you've brought up Mikey Dickerson completely unprompted (both here and in the OP's comment section), and that your account is just two hours old. It's fine if you take issue with the Silicon Valley mindset in government IT, but there's no reason to make it personal.

bfb10 6y ago
I’m alarmed by you reading my admitting it’s a shame to actively lobby to disassemble what he’s built and walked away with a sense of attack instead of my deepest respect for him conflicting with my views on the environment he brought with him not necessarily being the answer. For better or worse, he’s the face of bringing Big Web out here, and I mention him to indicate that I know what I’m talking about. Your interpretation conveniently assumes malevolence, and HN conveniently doesn’t let me respond to your allegation on my original account and IP due to ratelimiting. A close family member tried to explain QAnon to me the other day. Working against Mikey’s efforts feels similar. It’s actually incredibly disappointing to give conflicting advice to government than Mikey, but I can’t actively lobby for the Web way of working in government any more. Worth noting he came out here before Kubernetes existed. Or I’m just bashing him for sport, your (disingenuous) call.
- alexose 6y ago
  The reason it seems like an attack is due to the hostile tone of your comments, the burner account, and the unfounded/unsourced accusation that USDS left its partners behind. I apologize if you just wanted to discuss the merits of a startup-minded approach to government IT, but I'm honestly skeptical of your motivations. USDS ruffled many feathers among the entrenched IT interests, and I've seen what the propaganda response looks like first hand. If you really believe that you're fighting the good fight, then I'd welcome a direct conversation. Even a phone call if you like. I promise that I'm not in any way similar to a QAnon believer.
  - bfb09 6y ago
    Perhaps my beef with your cadre is assuming that questioning its merits is AFS propaganda coming from someone who’s never set foot south of Embarcadero and assuming everyone who mentions principals has an axe to grind. You’ve painted a lovely caricature of who you think your opposition is, but you’re looking in entirely the wrong direction. Hint: Two FAANGs. I don’t speak on the telephone with underhanded accusations, sorry.
    - alexose 6y ago
      Heh, ok. I know when I'm getting trolled. What was that main account of yours, again?
      - hoseja 6y ago
        Guy is either a really weird troll or a proper schizo. He mentioned "sympathetic ears in the government" at least three times.
        bfb09 6y ago
        Perhaps because I’m a government lobbyist and consultant formerly of FAANG with 24 years of experience trying to warn the Web industry that the exact thesis of the article is turning non-Web sectors against them? Couldn’t possibly be that, no, I have to be schizophrenic or a troll. The reason I know you don’t have schizophrenia close to you in your life is how willing you are to throw it at an anonymous commenter with a dismissive gesture toward “schizo”. You’d shut up if you knew what it’s like. And you and “a proper response to accusing you of being a conspiracy means I’m being trolled when really I have no response” wonder why I change HN accounts like I change socks. Perhaps it’s because I hold this community in the utmost contempt precisely because of you and people like you, and I have zero interest in building a reputation among the harmful, toxic people who don’t realize how wrong they have it that I am working to excise from the conversation. Take it or leave it. The good news for you is that you’re on the comfortable side of the argument so you will never get flagged or chastised by dang. Flagrantly accusing someone of psychological defect due to not liking their opinion is okay depending on the target and beliefs.

bfb10 6y ago

I’m alarmed by you reading my admitting it’s a shame to actively lobby to disassemble what he’s built and walked away with a sense of attack instead of my deepest respect for him conflicting with my views on the environment he brought with him not necessarily being the answer. For better or worse, he’s the face of bringing Big Web out here, and I mention him to indicate that I know what I’m talking about. Your interpretation conveniently assumes malevolence, and HN conveniently doesn’t let me respond to your allegation on my original account and IP due to ratelimiting. A close family member tried to explain QAnon to me the other day. Working against Mikey’s efforts feels similar. It’s actually incredibly disappointing to give conflicting advice to government than Mikey, but I can’t actively lobby for the Web way of working in government any more. Worth noting he came out here before Kubernetes existed. Or I’m just bashing him for sport, your (disingenuous) call.

alexose 6y ago
The reason it seems like an attack is due to the hostile tone of your comments, the burner account, and the unfounded/unsourced accusation that USDS left its partners behind. I apologize if you just wanted to discuss the merits of a startup-minded approach to government IT, but I'm honestly skeptical of your motivations. USDS ruffled many feathers among the entrenched IT interests, and I've seen what the propaganda response looks like first hand. If you really believe that you're fighting the good fight, then I'd welcome a direct conversation. Even a phone call if you like. I promise that I'm not in any way similar to a QAnon believer.
- bfb09 6y ago
  Perhaps my beef with your cadre is assuming that questioning its merits is AFS propaganda coming from someone who’s never set foot south of Embarcadero and assuming everyone who mentions principals has an axe to grind. You’ve painted a lovely caricature of who you think your opposition is, but you’re looking in entirely the wrong direction. Hint: Two FAANGs. I don’t speak on the telephone with underhanded accusations, sorry.
  - alexose 6y ago
    Heh, ok. I know when I'm getting trolled. What was that main account of yours, again?
    - hoseja 6y ago
      Guy is either a really weird troll or a proper schizo. He mentioned "sympathetic ears in the government" at least three times.
      - bfb09 6y ago
        Perhaps because I’m a government lobbyist and consultant formerly of FAANG with 24 years of experience trying to warn the Web industry that the exact thesis of the article is turning non-Web sectors against them? Couldn’t possibly be that, no, I have to be schizophrenic or a troll. The reason I know you don’t have schizophrenia close to you in your life is how willing you are to throw it at an anonymous commenter with a dismissive gesture toward “schizo”. You’d shut up if you knew what it’s like. And you and “a proper response to accusing you of being a conspiracy means I’m being trolled when really I have no response” wonder why I change HN accounts like I change socks. Perhaps it’s because I hold this community in the utmost contempt precisely because of you and people like you, and I have zero interest in building a reputation among the harmful, toxic people who don’t realize how wrong they have it that I am working to excise from the conversation. Take it or leave it. The good news for you is that you’re on the comfortable side of the argument so you will never get flagged or chastised by dang. Flagrantly accusing someone of psychological defect due to not liking their opinion is okay depending on the target and beliefs.