It's not just about number of journalists, but more about the culture of NYT. NYT made a garage handle much larger than it actually was by using telescope camer

It's not just about number of journalists, but more about the culture of NYT. NYT made a garage handle much larger than it actually was by using telescope camera on the article on so-called noose. And is this truth-finding? NYT published opinions like "Yes, we literally mean abolish police". They published articles like "Are protests unsafe? What experts say may depend on who's protesting what". Of course they didn't lie. They just publish one side of the sotry. Oh, and that 4000 opinions that the orange man is evil? Great, I guess, and what policies and executive orders did the orange man signs and pushes? What are the motivations behind the controversial policies based on facts and data? Where are the debates of the implications of the policies? No no no, those are wrong questions. All I need to know is that the orange man is evil, right? That's the truth ,right? Or am I a bigot, a racist, an evil person, a xenophobia just because I'm curious about the details of what the orange man did in his presidency?