3 ms·
It's unfortunate that a major newspaper has a well-known bias (in this case, against Google). Makes it hard to trust anything they say on the subject; although
by bsimpson 6y ago
It's unfortunate that a major newspaper has a well-known bias (in this case, against Google). Makes it hard to trust anything they say on the subject; although a known bias is certainly better than a surreptitious one.
- ocdtrekkie 6y agoThis is an incredibly ironic statement from a Google employee who is not disclosing such in this comment or their profile.
- ariwilson 6y agoEngage with the comment; not the commenter. Some basic evidence: https://www.google.com/search?q=rupert+murdoch+google&rlz=1C5CHFA_enUS845US846&oq=rupert+murdoch+google&aqs=chrome..69i57j0l5j46j0.3325j0j1&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8 https://www.google.com/search?q=rupert+murdoch+google&rlz=1C...
- ocdtrekkie 6y agoI am engaging with the comment, about how bias is bad, and surreptitious bias is worse... The fact that you're both working for the company in question is kinda relevant to that.
- Traster 6y agoWould you care to cite some evidence rather than baselessly slander the 2nd largest US newspaper (by circulation)?