4 ms·
Thats only one thing she is saying. The other thing she is saying is that there is no room for anyone who falls outside the orthodoxy of the new progressive rel
by notmyfriend 6y ago
Thats only one thing she is saying. The other thing she is saying is that there is no room for anyone who falls outside the orthodoxy of the new progressive religion.
- TeaDrunk 6y agoShe's politicizing a totally nonpolitical issue. She was totally fine until she live-tweeted public insults about her co workers during a company meeting. If it were not for her politicizing the issue she would be immediately fired.
- notmyfriend 6y agoYou could have made that point if they had not just purged the leadership of the opinion section because they dared to publish some republicans opinion piece. When even international press criticise what they did at NY Times it you know you have a problem.
- Traster 6y agoFirstly, the leader of the opinion section resigned, and secondly, it wasn't because of a republican opinion piece - of which there have been hundreds, but because the editorial standards of the Op-Ed section repeatedly fell short of the standards they claimed.
- notmyfriend 6y agoLol the defence of the Editorial standards. There are no good editorial standards in the whole NY Times anymore. Any paper that can publish the utter ridiculous historical revisionist 1619 project can't in any way be defended as having any editorial standards.
- TeaDrunk 6y agoThe one guy that got purged admitted to not reading an article before approving it for publication. That person would've been fired under any normal circumstance with great fanfare.
- nailer 6y ago> She was totally fine until she live-tweeted public insults about her co workers during a company meeting. Do you have a reference for this?