4 ms·

You are absolutely right - you can't just handover a kill switch for your business to a megacorp. However, there are a lot of instances where alternatives are n

You are absolutely right - you can't just handover a kill switch for your business to a megacorp. However, there are a lot of instances where alternatives are not viable because of the same megacorps. For example, email is a major online ID and being locked out of it can be disastrous even for an individual. Ideally, you would want an email server of your own - but then the 2 major email providers simply junk the mail from small servers even when they have good spam filter score. Similar story about search engines directing traffic to imposters. There are no reasons to believe that this is unintentional. This wouldn't be a problem if everyone else had the same priorities as you. What alternative do we have other than to loudly shame them where it matters and get as many people to off those platforms?

DNied 6y ago
So far, only Microsoft has been a nuisance to my personal SMTP server (there's an open issue about Microsoft's dubious blacklists on GitHub, with several participants: https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/microsoft-365-docs/issues/592#issuecomment-558130249 https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/microsoft-365-docs/issues/5...). Just a little part of why I hate and mistrust that company.
- BenjiWiebe 6y ago
  Me too. I've repeatedly had deliverability problems to Microsoft. Everywhere else has had no problems apart from the initial setup when I didn't know what I was doing.
jacquesm 6y ago
That's a good point, especially about the email. I hope that I will be able to ride this one out until my pension date arrives and I no longer have to worry about that. The internet started with the best of intentions but it is rapidly turning into something far worse than AOL: at least with AOL you had the option to ignore it.