3 ms·
Sure, but to even mention it now is disingenuous because they’re not even close to having a solution that their own engineering department would be willing to
by SheinhardtWigCo 6y ago
Sure, but to even mention it now is disingenuous because they’re not even close to having a solution that their own engineering department would be willing to ship.
You and I have no idea whether it’s possible to get close to level 5 with their currently shipping hardware. Neither do they. And this stuff about being 10-100x safer than a human is pure fantasy right now. The industry is incredibly far away from that and there’s no evidence to suggest Tesla is years ahead of other teams working on the problem.
- gibolt 6y ago10x is within striking distance. Search for Autopilot reporting for the evidence. While it is biased towards highway miles, all the safety features augment the human driver. This will only get better with time. Shipping is different from functional. You don't know what their engineering department thinks. Unless you are an insider, it is hard to guess the timeline, trajectory, or confidence levels.
- itsoktocry 6y ago>Unless you are an insider, it is hard to guess the timeline, trajectory, or confidence levels. You realize that as a public company who is selling this product, they are obligated to spell this out to consumers and shareholders, right? The entire point is for it to be unambiguous.
- Piskvorrr 6y agoYet you are confident of that "10x" statistic. Therefore: are you a) leaking inside data, or b) pulling numbers out of thin air?