3 ms·
Curious why the author declares Container Linux bullshit/unsuccessful? I thought it was a wonderful project that got better over its (brief) lifetime. The activ
by sisk 6y ago
Curious why the author declares Container Linux bullshit/unsuccessful? I thought it was a wonderful project that got better over its (brief) lifetime. The active/passive upgrade was an absolute blessing. If the declaration is it was unsuccessful because it no longer exists, Flatcar and Fedora CoreOS are pretty straightforward successors. fcos is basically functionally equivalent if you don't use rpm-ostree layers and if you use podman in place of any rkt containers. If the complaint is "systemd," that's fine—it's not the OS for you—but I don't think that makes it bullshit.
I didn't like having to move cl machines to fcos but it really wasn't that bad and I still get coordinated, active/passive upgrades. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯