> Is this curiosity, or a moving goalpost as part of an argument? The reason I ask is because there seems to be a side argument on who is paying more, domestic

> Is this curiosity, or a moving goalpost as part of an argument? The reason I ask is because there seems to be a side argument on who is paying more, domestic or international students. I would’ve thought foreigners pay more (that seems to be the case in the UK), but would defer to your first hand expertise. However, what the article is predicated on is just that international students bring in “enough” revenue that they can be used as leverage against the universities. I was wondering whether you’d concede that.