3 ms·
This is like the RISC vs CISC debate: 25 years ago some of the loudest individuals proclaimed that x86 was dead, and we’d all be on MIPS/PowerPC/SPARC/Alpha. R
by asguy 6y ago
This is like the RISC vs CISC debate: 25 years ago some of the loudest individuals proclaimed that x86 was dead, and we’d all be on MIPS/PowerPC/SPARC/Alpha. Reality doesn’t always match up with idealism.
Engineering has a habit of advancing due to incremental improvements. The ICE still has room to grow and become more efficient.
- adrianN 6y agoThe ICE has no room to become carbon neutral with efficiencies that are even comparable to electrics. Getting from electricity to liquid fuel to movement probably has losses exceeding 90%. Electric cars on the other hand are like 80% efficient.
- thomquaid 6y agoYou are very wrong here. Ethanol as an ICE fuel could be done carbon neutral very quickly thru yeast, and battery technology will probably never reach comparable energy densities in weight limited applications (mobile applications). We may engineer a society where the limitations of batteries are not limiting (because we/goods never travel far), but only a fool thinks you need electricity as an energy source for carbon neutral ICE.
- adrianN 6y agoI think you're underestimating the amount of land you need to feed all that yeast.