I'm no fan of hers, but this seems like sensationalized click bait. Why is it important or noteworthy that she employed ex-military as personal security? Many

I'm no fan of hers, but this seems like sensationalized click bait. Why is it important or noteworthy that she employed ex-military as personal security? Many (rich) people do and many private security firms actively recruit ex-military. US citizens can and do serve in the British military and even for the SAS. Is there any suggestion that that she was knowingly employing people who were not entitled to work in the USA? That might be relevant to her case. I don't see the reality that she had private security to be relevant in any way.