4 ms·
Wow, a classic case of "What were they thinking?".. > a senior customer service rep If an intern or new hire was guilty, it'd be more understadable. Perhaps,
by lioeters 6y ago
Wow, a classic case of "What were they thinking?"..
> a senior customer service rep
If an intern or new hire was guilty, it'd be more understadable. Perhaps, being senior, they got too comfortable with the power they wielded - but without the tech savvy to understand the consequences.
- gdubs 6y agoThe fictional character “Dollar Bill” from the show Billions comes to mind.
- taneq 6y ago> "What were they thinking?".. It’s their own network, it’s the LAST place they’d look!!
- j79 6y ago> "What were they thinking?" There were sites that tracked ratio which required maintaining a certain ratio to continue to be a member. Some members, however, took pride in having a ratio that skewed uploads over downloads. I personally know people who paid for T1s just to maintain their "rep" of having the highest upload ratio. Not saying this is the case, but having access to a T1 back in the day was almost a way to "boost" their rep on these sites.
- wil421 6y agoI can remember someone denying me an invite to a private tracker because I might “hurt his ratio”. He eventually relented but it was a hassle. My internet was faster than his at the time so it was a factor for sure.
- crtasm 6y agoWas he giving you access to his account? I can't see any way that inviting you to register your own account could let you affect his ratio.
- wil421 6y agoThe admins could mess with your ratio if someone you invited wasn’t seeding.
- legopelle 6y agoMany private trackers may ban you if one of your invitees misbehave.