2 ms·
I have read the other replies, that don't appear to have been made by anyone with any experience of parallel construction.
by JoeSmithson 6y ago
I have read the other replies, that don't appear to have been made by anyone with any experience of parallel construction.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- dllthomas 6y agoI don't have experience of extortion, either, but I'm plenty qualified to object. Your position seems to be that there are legitimate reasons it was introduced. I don't disagree with that. That doesn't mean that the process doesn't involve lying in court to deprive people of their rights. You say "conceal a source" but that is precisely depriving the accused of their explicit constitutional right to be "confronted with the witnesses against them". (I will note that I've definitely been speaking with a US focus - not all of my comments will generalize.)