3 ms·
Speaking of lack of internal dialog I noticed a quieting of it as a side effect of a medication I was on - normally volume didn't exactly apply but it was diffi
by Nasrudith 6y ago
Speaking of lack of internal dialog I noticed a quieting of it as a side effect of a medication I was on - normally volume didn't exactly apply but it was difficult to head myself think - not like it getting drowned out but that the thoughts themselves were harder to hear. Speaking of mouthing the words when reading - subvocalization occurs when reading with most people in their larynx. Most people who don't mouth the words silently say them instead as a "good enough" measure. Obviously not the case in deaf-mutes who never learned to speak of course.
- core-questions 6y ago> harder to hear. Interesting. Would you really qualify that as being like "quieter volume", or was it more like it was harder to "recognize" words out of the dialogue? > Obviously not the case in deaf-mutes who never learned to speak of course. I wonder what reading is actually like for these folks, since letters symbolize sounds; they _must_ recognize word-at-a-time with no sub-vocalizing, right? I hope we get lucky and a random person with experience in the field stops by ;)
- Nasrudith 6y agoLike a quieter volume - even though normally the concept of a volume to thought words didn't even apply.