3 ms·
>> ubiquity of Linux and decline of Windows > Should I read this as sarcasm? It could only be sarcastic if he's referring to "Linux on the desktop." I don't
by ardy42 6y ago
>> ubiquity of Linux and decline of Windows
> Should I read this as sarcasm?
It could only be sarcastic if he's referring to "Linux on the desktop." I don't have any numbers, but I wouldn't be surprised if he was correct about servers.
- DubiousPusher 6y agoCorrect. I am referring to everything except desktop computing. I can see how this would be confusing as I was just referencing desktop prossesor market patterns of the 90s/00s. But I do think Windows's position in the desktop space is somewhat unsustainable at this point. I personally prefer Windows but I just don't see how a heterogenous user interface experience (with users on iOS and Android for mobile and Windows for desktop) will abide for long. I think it's only a matter of time before mobile OSes make some serious inroads to desktop. Though I suppose Google has been salivating at that thought for neaely a decade.
- cameldrv 6y agoIf you look at the overall "computing devices with a reasonably high performance CPU" market, Linux has won the server market, and through Android, won the phone/tablet market. If you squint a bit, you can lump MacOS and iOS in this in that they have a Unix core and use a lot of the same software stack as Linux. 50 years ago, IBM owned the computing market with mainframes. They still dominate the mainframe market, that's just become a smaller and smaller portion of the overall computing market as time has gone on.