5 ms·

Please see: 1. https://lobste.rs/s/c7fpo6/why_aes_gcm_sucks#c_hjzdar https://lobste.rs/s/c7fpo6/why_aes_gcm_sucks#c_hjzdar 2. https://soatok.blog/about https:

Please see: 1. https://lobste.rs/s/c7fpo6/why_aes_gcm_sucks#c_hjzdar https://lobste.rs/s/c7fpo6/why_aes_gcm_sucks#c_hjzdar 2. https://soatok.blog/about https://soatok.blog/about 3. https://soatok.blog/2020/07/09/a-word-on-anti-furry-sentiments-in-the-tech-community/ https://soatok.blog/2020/07/09/a-word-on-anti-furry-sentimen... etc.

dependenttypes 6y ago
Would you say the same if the article was filled with "loli" anime characters instead?
- deleted 6y ago
  [deleted]
  - dependenttypes 6y ago
    Just like you have a furry character as a representation of your identity a lot of people have an anime character as a representation of their identity or what they wish to be, this is true especially for transgender people and I say that as one of them. I also never mentioned pornography, saying that this is "pedophilic pornography" is no different to saying that furry is zoophilic pornography. This was not intended as a flame bait, rather it was constricted by the extremely negative experience that I had with people with furry avatars. Edit: previous post was "My fursona is a representation of my identity, and comparing that to a genre of pedophilic pornography is the kind of flame bait that isn't welcome on HN.", it then was edited to say "[not interested in flamebait about "loli"]". He seems not to be interested in a "flamebait about "loli"" but he is certainly interested in continuing the exclusionist and general asshole-ish reaction that furries have against anime fans.
fluidcruft 6y ago
So their idea is to make the world more accepting of furries by being an asshole?
- deleted 6y ago
  [deleted]
- dependenttypes 6y ago
  Their response to my post certainly makes it seem so.
95_JL_OK 6y ago
This has nothing to do with being anti-furry. If this were full of MCU characters, it would be just as difficult to take seriously.

dependenttypes 6y ago

Would you say the same if the article was filled with "loli" anime characters instead?

deleted 6y ago
[deleted]
- dependenttypes 6y ago
  Just like you have a furry character as a representation of your identity a lot of people have an anime character as a representation of their identity or what they wish to be, this is true especially for transgender people and I say that as one of them. I also never mentioned pornography, saying that this is "pedophilic pornography" is no different to saying that furry is zoophilic pornography. This was not intended as a flame bait, rather it was constricted by the extremely negative experience that I had with people with furry avatars. Edit: previous post was "My fursona is a representation of my identity, and comparing that to a genre of pedophilic pornography is the kind of flame bait that isn't welcome on HN.", it then was edited to say "[not interested in flamebait about "loli"]". He seems not to be interested in a "flamebait about "loli"" but he is certainly interested in continuing the exclusionist and general asshole-ish reaction that furries have against anime fans.

fluidcruft 6y ago

So their idea is to make the world more accepting of furries by being an asshole?

deleted 6y ago
[deleted]
dependenttypes 6y ago
Their response to my post certainly makes it seem so.

95_JL_OK 6y ago

This has nothing to do with being anti-furry. If this were full of MCU characters, it would be just as difficult to take seriously.