The author describes the unification process of the non-gravity forces under various symmetries and that there are desires to find a way to unify these under a

The author describes the unification process of the non-gravity forces under various symmetries and that there are desires to find a way to unify these under a GUT, and also describes there is a need to modernize gravity so it fits logically with the QFTs. But then the author seems to make a point of that a ToE has to be a GUT with gravity in it and that might not be how nature works? Which I agree with but I would not have used that semantics of ToE. I think most physicists at this point would settle for any logical merging of gravity with the QFTs that is consistent even if it postulates more free parameters and not less :) Anyway, just a nitpick on the terminology.. just seemed a bit click-baity (but I'm sure that was not the intention).