3 ms·
I was simply clarifying the author's claims, which did not match what GGP said they were. It turns out both of the author's claims are correct. Sibling comment
by lern_too_spel 6y ago
I was simply clarifying the author's claims, which did not match what GGP said they were.
It turns out both of the author's claims are correct. Sibling comment shows why the repetition claim is correct, and you showed why the deterministic claim is correct (by definition).