4 ms·

> Almost nobody is going to haproxy.org on their smartphone with any intention of actually doing anything with the software. This is where you get it entirely

> Almost nobody is going to haproxy.org on their smartphone with any intention of actually doing anything with the software. This is where you get it entirely wrong. I read this news and I, as an extensive nginx/traffic user, wanted to check out haproxy to understand if it was worth a shot. The .org page is plagued with general usability and readability problems to the point that it's practically unreadable when compared with the page served through the .com domain. There is no way around it. You don't fix problems by turning a blind eye and playing the denying card. More importantly, this sort of technical snafu is helps form the public image of the product, and thus this sort of poor performance reflects poorly on the product.

somehnguy 6y ago
If you were actually serious about it you would just mentally note it and revisit when you were on a more capable device. Perusing for replacement infrastructure software via mobile is just a casual thing, and foolish if you're actually trying to get anything done. Nobody is swapping out any tech via their mobile browser impression. All this is pretty complicated software and you're going to want to do a lot of reading/inspection before making decisions like that. That is not done via a 5" display. I stand with my view that there is no problem to fix here. The site is clear & understandable to anyone who seriously plans on using it or is using it.