That was the 2nd pararaph. The first paragraph was, "This is a huge update fixing many bugs and security issues, it also expands on the functionality of the ne

That was the 2nd pararaph. The first paragraph was, "This is a huge update fixing many bugs and security issues, it also expands on the functionality of the new SandMan.exe UI component, Check out the full ChangeLog for more details." Paragraphs 1 & 2 do not go well together, and I will never use this product, despite my having tested sandboxie itself in the past. Odd Story: The single person listed on the github page also has a fork of the original DiskCryptor code. At a prior employers I had worked, we once wanted to embedd DC into a larger framework. After some time we were able to find people to contact. They were using some elaborate scheme to hide their identities and yet converse over the phone. Since it was an "Open Source" project, and we already had the source code, we had reached out to them as a courtesy and nothing more. In fact we had already found serious bugs that we had fixed interally. Yet, they demanded an astronomically high sum for the use of DC. What did we do? The room of us laughed at the DC folks on speaker phone, then we went off and finished our own framework without using DC. There is a small segment of people on the fringes of the security industry who work for a government (trying to get people to use their product), are running from a government, have stolen code from a government, are involved with shady business dealings, etc. It's best to stay as far away from these people as possible at all times. I'm not saying the person who started this github falls into that category, but it's best to think about that before using what is a security product.