4 ms·
I would assume bad leadership, even Amazon that has reportedly dubious work life balance has been able to pivot/grow but Bezos is able to lead by example and th
by lalos 6y ago
I would assume bad leadership, even Amazon that has reportedly dubious work life balance has been able to pivot/grow but Bezos is able to lead by example and they have a lot of interesting 'ethos'. Then you have cases like Microsoft and Apple which have been around for way longer and have weathered multiple storms and computing eras. Google and Facebook just have ads, have not worked on their trustworthiness (ironically we even see posts about how real/fake are the ad engagements to this date) therefore they are stuck even if they are able to pay the salaries of the so called 'smartest' engineers (who are willing to join a one trick pony company). Microsoft built that trust by maintaining Office for the whole enterprise world (which granted, is a boring endeavor to be fixing bugs that 2-3 companies that use Excel hit but it pays long term dividends) and Apple built that trust by building easy to use consumer products that just work. Disclaimer, mostly talking about revenue streams and not products.
- scarface74 6y agoI keep hearing about Amazon’s bad work life balance. I have a friend who worked at Amazon in Seattle on the business side (not software development ) and he said it was brutal. I work remotely on the consulting side. It’s about the same work life balance as I’ve had my entire career. It’s actually better than my last two jobs. At those, I had to be the “adult supervision” trying to overall their processes while juggling releasing a product and for my last job, trying to figure out ways to cut costs and increase efficiencies post Covid. I’m just a much better paid peon now. My experimentations causing a large AWS bill is not exactly a problem now....