4 ms·
Perhaps it's merely coincidental, but Google created this TCP connection tracking data where it wasn't there before or was of much lower fidelity; they made a s
by bsdetector 6y ago
Perhaps it's merely coincidental, but Google created this TCP connection tracking data where it wasn't there before or was of much lower fidelity; they made a specific exception for GA to reuse one connection across domains for 6 minutes in HTTP/1 in Chrome and then later had their protocol rubber-stamped that reuses one connection to GA for 30+ minutes in HTTP/2.
So yes, I would like to see some proof, for example a specific corporate denial, that this tracking data that they created isn't being used.
- longtimegoogler 6y agoI agree that a public statement would be good because that shows more commitment to the policy as opposed to maybe a temporary state of affairs. My belief is that first part cookie data is currently not used for ad targeting which is why third party cookies are also used and is one of the reasons that the whole impending death of the third party cookie cook have such a big effect on the online advertising industry. Whether that means Google will look for workarounds involving the analytics first party cookie, I don't know.