2 ms·

Being at ~100% after 45 hours and at 0% after 24 hours are quite different.

• mhb 16y ago
  Since you're intent on belaboring the point, it doesn't claim that one is at ~100% and the other was at 0%. More significantly, if the assertion is that one is more stable, don't you think it would be more compelling to demonstrate its operation for, say, a month? Or did they build this one leaf 45 hours before issuing a press release?
  • jedsmith 16y ago
    "Lifespan" implies that at the end of the period, the old leaf died. There would be no other reason to use the word. The submitted article also mentions 45 hours without a drop in activity, implying 100% at the end of 45 hours for the new leaf without any kind of assertion about a lifespan for the new leaf. The linked ACS release doesn't discuss this, either. Grant him the point. Truthfully, you're splitting hairs, and it really isn't worth arguing about, especially since this entire thing seems dubious without proof.