5 ms·
But even if I want to spend more, how will I know I am no spending more on inefficient stuff like a touchscreen on my fridge? Spending more money is sadly not e
by alex7o 6y ago
But even if I want to spend more, how will I know I am no spending more on inefficient stuff like a touchscreen on my fridge? Spending more money is sadly not equal to better quality, but I don't know what designates it.
- krapht 6y agoThere's a pretty good correlation between the two, let's not pretend otherwise.
- dpc_pw 6y agoIs there? How strong? Out of that $100 how much of extra weeks of usage will I get and with what confidence level? Also - Is it affected by the level of hardness in the local water and my patterns of usage ajd types of detergent I use? Does additional reliability affect any other parameters like energy and water usage? In a multi-variable comparison like this it is impossible to say much about future past 5 years with much certainty, while the price is single biggest objective metric.
- MattGaiser 6y agoYou would look at the warranty policies and guarantees. A 10 year warranty product is going to be better than one with a 3 year warranty.
- icelancer 6y agoBuy industrial/commercial appliances. They're ugly as hell and last forever. Except... people want nice looking things.
- faeyanpiraat 6y agoThis.
- faeyanpiraat 6y agoIn my experience, getting a couple of years old used premium item (which used to be like double the price) for the same price of a new consumer item is always a good idea for example for Notebooks. Compared to new plastic consumer class crap, older premium dell notebooks have excellent usability, they last forever and you can even throw them around without worrying about their metal outer layer breaking. The downside is that they might look ugly for some people. Also most people I recommended this, dismissed the idea, because buying stuff used were somehow unthinkable for them? I just don’t get it.