4 ms·

Not the op but sure. No sources for any of the many claims in the article. No references to studies. No number based claims such as "9 out of 10 times x happens

• cbolton 6y ago
  The same can be said of most non-scientific articles, blog posts, and many other texts that are nonetheless valuable. Even for scientific papers, this is not a sufficient reason for dismissal. Here is Einstein's original paper on Special Relativity: http://myweb.rz.uni-augsburg.de/~eckern/adp/history/einstein-papers/1905_17_891-921.pdf http://myweb.rz.uni-augsburg.de/~eckern/adp/history/einstein... And the initial papers on General Relativity: http://myweb.rz.uni-augsburg.de/~eckern/adp/history/einstein-papers/1912_38_355-369.pdf http://myweb.rz.uni-augsburg.de/~eckern/adp/history/einstein... http://myweb.rz.uni-augsburg.de/~eckern/adp/history/einstein-papers/1912_38_443-458.pdf http://myweb.rz.uni-augsburg.de/~eckern/adp/history/einstein... Number of references in these papers: 0.
  • carapace 6y ago
    There are equations unambiguously relating well-defined values with established physical interpretations or meaning.