7 ms·
So obviously this can tie into current social media and the spread of mal-information such as antivax, COVID mask protests, and memes that people let alter thei
by tenebrisalietum 6y ago
So obviously this can tie into current social media and the spread of mal-information such as antivax, COVID mask protests, and memes that people let alter their impression of people.
The traditional way to mitigate misinformation's harm was education and a respect for the educated.
I think three things have happened that have prevented this from working:
- We decided decades ago that people needed college degrees to enter much of the workforce. This has reduced education to an employment gateway in the minds of the majority of non-independently wealthy society. It may not have done so if people actually needed the degrees for their jobs and alternate career-starting things like apprenticeships were more available/known.
- Education for all is seen as a method of making society for equal and therefore the solution of a number of social ills. It really is, but has to be done properly otherwise it doesn't work. Children who do not keep up tend to be socially promoted. Children who are outcasts for various reasons, including parental problems at home, drop out or degrade the experience for others in the school. This either causes or is because many of the non-independently wealthy masses see public school as a public babysitter, and they more or less have to see things this way if they are living paycheck to paycheck, because they can't afford to have someone stay home for their children.
- The Internet has accelerated and likely caused fragmentation and in some cases destruction of mass media, and has made mass media have to sell out and become sensationalized to survive. Thus there is less and less of a common media between people, and therefore less of an opportunity to provide any substrate of a common culture. Social media bubbles exacerbate this.
- Fellshard 6y agoWe're also seeing an increasing number of cases where high-profile experts are making high-profile claims that then fold in full public view; or experts that make contradictory claims, under which case: from the perspective of a non-expert, who's right? Education is essential, and yet is not a panacea for thinking well. So when experts can't seem to give people a straight answer, they'll simply turn to their peer group and hope for the best. And right now, as you noted, peer groups primarily consist of highly self-selected social media groups.
- watwut 6y agoFirst problem is expecting expert answer to be simple, easy to understand, without asterisks and conditions. Experts often disagree about nuances or have competing theories. Second issue is tendency to take the first confident guy with simple answer as expert. The folding expert is pretty often not considered expert by people who deal with the field - he is typically just someone confident and well spoken.
- Fellshard 6y agoAnd how is the layman supposed to differentiate between the two? It's a fairly intractable problem. Credentializing ends up having the opposite effect of creating an orthodoxy that freezes the ability to think.
- watwut 6y agoWell, credentials would be one thing. The lack of credentials sometimes is not grave, but most of confident non experts don't have right ones. They may be experts on something else. Second thing is, if too many credentialed people object, there might be issue. Third, lack of nuance, lack of asterisk and too much confidence are bad signs.