> Hundreds of thousands of dispersed voting locations means that to pull off a “hack” you’d need to hack thousands or perhaps 10s of thousands of locations all

> Hundreds of thousands of dispersed voting locations means that to pull off a “hack” you’d need to hack thousands or perhaps 10s of thousands of locations all with their own details. No, all you need to do is play with the distribution of those hundreds of thousands of locations such that "your" voters have an easier time getting to them, on average, than your opponents' voters. Your threat model isn't quite right. A deliberate third party attempt to fabricate votes isn't the only attack vector. You need a system that is robust against untrustworthy insiders too.