I mean.... that case was neither "as it is written" nor "as intended". In that case the court simply ruled on what was morally right. LGBTQ people were not in

I mean.... that case was neither "as it is written" nor "as intended". In that case the court simply ruled on what was morally right. LGBTQ people were not intended to be protected in the 1967 law, nor was it written as such. I agree they deserve protections and Congress should amend the law as such. It's sad SCOTUS is made to break its role to fix this.