4 ms·
I think you completely missed the point. If you think the overall fact that humans are better at face identification than audio identification is relevant here,
by mlthoughts2018 6y ago
I think you completely missed the point. If you think the overall fact that humans are better at face identification than audio identification is relevant here, you missed the point, since that high level fact is not related to this specific problem or the comparison being made.
- sillysaurusx 6y agoCan you explain the point? Because I've missed it too.
- mlthoughts2018 6y agoThe task of disambiguating speakers, relative to skill at other audio processing tasks, is more similar to disambiguating superimposed faces, relative to skill at other vision tasks. It is not similar to quickly recognizing several different faces that are present in a video stream. Tasks requiring simultaneous processing of focused attention on multiple input streams are not very related to human visual or audio processing. These types of tasks are not similar to attending to things in peripheral vision or peripheral audio.