> for one because the government mandates every business over a certain size (IIRC 50 employees or so) to vote on unionization which is then binding. To me, th

> for one because the government mandates every business over a certain size (IIRC 50 employees or so) to vote on unionization which is then binding. To me, this sound like a guarantee of greater worker freedom than anything else. Somehow economic “freedom” in the US seems to equate to corporate structures where CEOs and other managers have immense power over the lives of hundreds or thousands of workers (including their ability to get healthcare), with almost no counterbalancing force. Implementing this kind of rule seems a pretty sane check on that level of authoritarianism, no? Beyond a certain level, the workers actually have to be given a say themselves?