Sorry, my sentence was poorly formulated, and your counterpoint is attractive. Let me try it again: Is there any portion of reality that cannot have the evolut

Sorry, my sentence was poorly formulated, and your counterpoint is attractive. Let me try it again: Is there any portion of reality that cannot have the evolution of its set of magnitudes replicated in a Turing Machine? > there are plenty of things that are not computable I clicked on the article expecting to see something like a mapping between aspects of human intelligence and undecidability or the halting problem.