> So the main argument is that humans have intelligence that is impossible to express through reason or codification I think what it means is not about codifca

> So the main argument is that humans have intelligence that is impossible to express through reason or codification I think what it means is not about codifcation, but that to achieve GI machines would need to go through human experiences that are not possible to a machine. I don't agree, but I think that's the point the paper makes.