I see your point, but agree with the parent comment more. The current state of the C++ just doesn't require the committee to hurry up, and the language is not d

I see your point, but agree with the parent comment more. The current state of the C++ just doesn't require the committee to hurry up, and the language is not done, even if it would take five more years to have new standard approved. As I see it, the new standard just isn't something which would change the future of C++ in some significant way, and it is not the most pressing problem C++ has as a language. From my perspective, what I would like to see more is some alternative to boost, with similar functionality but without that meta-meta-programming. ;-) Simply, more cross-platform libraries comprehensible for the average C++ programmers.