2 ms·
That's a great article! FYI it mentions Andrea Dworkin though -- not Judith Butler, who you mentioned earlier. Not an expert but think they're fairly different
by adamsea 6y ago
That's a great article!
FYI it mentions Andrea Dworkin though -- not Judith Butler, who you mentioned earlier. Not an expert but think they're fairly different.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judith_Butler https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judith_Butler
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrea_Dworkin https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrea_Dworkin
I dunno, just seems like emotions are running high. To be fair, mine included. Sigh ...
- whatshisface 6y agoI think the association with Butler came from somewhere else* . The Dworkin reference was a positive one in Aaronson's original post. If you're really interested in digging through all the details, the original post by Aaronson that sparked the whole thing was called "comment 171." You may come away from it with different ideas than I, but you'll definitely come away from it with different ideas than the New Yorker. ;) * I admit that the "somewhere else" could have been my imagination.
- adamsea 6y agoI think we have to make a variety of assumptions to draw any conclusions about what the author of the New Yorker article intended. There’s too little info in the article to go on.