While I sympathize with this sentiment--I agree a lot of people today overreact and fail to suspend judgment in the absence of hard evidence against someone--th

While I sympathize with this sentiment--I agree a lot of people today overreact and fail to suspend judgment in the absence of hard evidence against someone--this isn't likely to go anywhere or do a lot of good because it lacks a solid philosophical foundation. It's only based on a sentiment, effectively: "we don't like xyz", instead of a moral or philosophical statement: "we oppose xyz because [good, solid, coherent reasons]". Don't get me wrong: I think there are very good reasons to support the general sentiment (though how this page expresses it is inflammatory and unfortunate), but in their absence there's little discussion to be had (and personally, I'm not interested in bringing them up here).