4 ms·
I'm not arguing that it can't. I was merely pointing out the proper 'burden of proof.' The article was criticized for failing to demonstrate that something can'
by lurquer 6y ago
I'm not arguing that it can't. I was merely pointing out the proper 'burden of proof.' The article was criticized for failing to demonstrate that something can't be done... that's not fair. The burden would be on the proponent of the proposition that a machine can attain general AI. That's all.
Perhaps there could be general AI... I'm not saying it can't be done. I would point out, though, that IF it is to be done, it certainly won't be by copying a brain. Nobody even knows the hell the brain works...
- michaelmrose 6y agoMaybe you are stuck on the notion of a computer as a silicon chip. Biological entities are just a special case of machine ergo it is already proved that a machine can attain general AI.
- codr7 6y agoSays who? You are subjectively observing yourself and reality from the inside. How can you be so sure? There is no proof, or we would not be having this discussion over and over again.