5 ms·
This is a really big stretch in interpretation but also in plausibility, since Latin is a dead language. But if it were true, then you'd have it your way: it'd
by NoSorryCannot 6y ago
This is a really big stretch in interpretation but also in plausibility, since Latin is a dead language.
But if it were true, then you'd have it your way: it'd also be inappropriate in professional settings that don't naturally necessitate it.
- 2038AD 6y ago> This is a really big stretch in interpretation According to Wikipedia[0], "[t]he placeholder text is taken from parts of the first book's discourse on hedonism." The first book being the first book of Cicero's De finibus bonorum et malorum. [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_finibus_bonorum_et_malorum https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_finibus_bonorum_et_malorum
- NoSorryCannot 6y agoLeast plausible of all is that someone would try to shore up this argument in good faith.
- 2038AD 6y agoTo be honest I'm sure it isn't erotica just as the Holy Bible is not despite verses like Ezekiel 23:20. I must also confess I did find the revelation a little amusing. It certainly says something about men (whether that's just the men of 70s from when both originate).