3 ms·
This is some contorted logic. "We will not privilege religion, so we will give a privileged tax exempt status to religion". Ha, nice, the Satanic Temple is als
by abetusk 6y ago
This is some contorted logic. "We will not privilege religion, so we will give a privileged tax exempt status to religion".
Ha, nice, the Satanic Temple is also tax exempt [1].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Satanic_Temple https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Satanic_Temple
- klyrs 6y agoI've been thinking a lot about the Satanic Temple recently. The supreme court has been ferociously eroding the separation of church and state lately. I wonder how they, and the public, would respond to public funding for a Satanic charter school that openly discriminated against heterosexual teachers and forced heterosexual students to undergo gay conversion therapy... Edit: to be clear, I don't think that it would be a good to do. But for all the fearmongering about the "gay agenda" to make your kids gay, there's a well-documented "straight agenda" that results in a high rate of suicide (and very few enduring conversions) of its victims. If we are equal in the eyes of the law, zero or both must be valid.
- true_religion 6y agoI’m not against a gay only school. It doesn’t sound too dissimilar to male or female only schools, which only seek to employ teachers of the same gender.