24 ms·

The article isn’t about Scott Aaronsen. Also I mean your phrase “uncritical childhood exposure to radical literature” is .... weird. “Childhood exposure to ra

The article isn’t about Scott Aaronsen. Also I mean your phrase “uncritical childhood exposure to radical literature” is .... weird. “Childhood exposure to radical literature”? “radical literature” almost sound like a disease.

whatshisface 6y ago
Just because he wasn't the subject doesn't mean it's okay to make materially false statements about him... >Also I mean your phrase “uncritical childhood exposure to radical literature” is .... weird. Well, I'm not qualified to write for the New Yorker, but surely they could have written a sentence that wasn't false. Maybe you could read a more detailed account on The Atlantic, and decide for yourself how it could be summarized. (Seriously, the "dating market," does not come up even once.) https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/01/the-blog-comment-that-achieved-an-internet-miracle/384539/ https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/01/the-blo...
- adamsea 6y ago
  That's a great article! FYI it mentions Andrea Dworkin though -- not Judith Butler, who you mentioned earlier. Not an expert but think they're fairly different. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judith_Butler https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judith_Butler https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrea_Dworkin https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrea_Dworkin I dunno, just seems like emotions are running high. To be fair, mine included. Sigh ...
  - whatshisface 6y ago
    I think the association with Butler came from somewhere else* . The Dworkin reference was a positive one in Aaronson's original post. If you're really interested in digging through all the details, the original post by Aaronson that sparked the whole thing was called "comment 171." You may come away from it with different ideas than I, but you'll definitely come away from it with different ideas than the New Yorker. ;) * I admit that the "somewhere else" could have been my imagination.
    - adamsea 6y ago
      I think we have to make a variety of assumptions to draw any conclusions about what the author of the New Yorker article intended. There’s too little info in the article to go on.

whatshisface 6y ago

Just because he wasn't the subject doesn't mean it's okay to make materially false statements about him... >Also I mean your phrase “uncritical childhood exposure to radical literature” is .... weird. Well, I'm not qualified to write for the New Yorker, but surely they could have written a sentence that wasn't false. Maybe you could read a more detailed account on The Atlantic, and decide for yourself how it could be summarized. (Seriously, the "dating market," does not come up even once.) https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/01/the-blog-comment-that-achieved-an-internet-miracle/384539/ https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/01/the-blo...

adamsea 6y ago
That's a great article! FYI it mentions Andrea Dworkin though -- not Judith Butler, who you mentioned earlier. Not an expert but think they're fairly different. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judith_Butler https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judith_Butler https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrea_Dworkin https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrea_Dworkin I dunno, just seems like emotions are running high. To be fair, mine included. Sigh ...
- whatshisface 6y ago
  I think the association with Butler came from somewhere else* . The Dworkin reference was a positive one in Aaronson's original post. If you're really interested in digging through all the details, the original post by Aaronson that sparked the whole thing was called "comment 171." You may come away from it with different ideas than I, but you'll definitely come away from it with different ideas than the New Yorker. ;) * I admit that the "somewhere else" could have been my imagination.
  - adamsea 6y ago
    I think we have to make a variety of assumptions to draw any conclusions about what the author of the New Yorker article intended. There’s too little info in the article to go on.