> Nearly everything you've said involves directly harming another person, for which we already have agreed upon laws forbiding Which would also eliminate eutha

> Nearly everything you've said involves directly harming another person, for which we already have agreed upon laws forbiding Which would also eliminate euthanasia as an option. If the law currently forbids euthanasia, then an "eat anything you want" law would still be invalidated when it's used for euthanasia, just like it would be invalidated for the other examples. > if drugs were decriminalized, drug mules wouldn't exist Cigarettes are not inherently criminalized, yet illegally selling cigarettes in bulk across state lines continues to be a problem. Illegal gun running also exists here, even for guns that aren't outlawed in any state. If there are cigarette mules and gun mules, there will probably be drug mules.