4 ms·
Yes. Because losing your job due to using hate speech is the same as losing your head for being on the wrong side of the committee of public safety. Next you'll
by d_e_solomon 6y ago
Yes. Because losing your job due to using hate speech is the same as losing your head for being on the wrong side of the committee of public safety. Next you'll tell me that I'm literally hitler.
- ekianjo 6y ago> Next you'll tell me that I'm literally hitler. You seem to be repeating yourself. > the same as losing your head for being on the wrong side of the committee of public safety. Your pattern recognition engine must have some problems. In 1789 and the following years people were vilified and arrested (and eventually killed by truckloads, but that's not the point) because they were too moderate or not extreme enough compared to the radicals leading the "new culture". Here's what St just said in the good old 90's (1790s): > "We must not only punish traitors, but all people who are not enthusiastic. There are only two kinds of citizens: the good and the bad. The Republic owes to the good its protection. To the bad it owes only death." And Robespierre: > "There are only two parties in France: the people and its enemies. We must exterminate those miserable villains who are eternally conspiring against the rights of man... We must exterminate all our enemies.” " If you don't see any parallel with what's happening right now (the insidious dichotomy between good and bad), minus the guillotine, I am not sure what else I can tell you.
- d_e_solomon 6y agoYour argument is that state sponsored violence for incorrect political opinions is the same as being fired by a private corporation for hate speech. Those aren't equivalent and one doesn't lead to the other.